Using innovative language, speech, and cognitive tests we improve the quality of intraoperative testing for preservation of brain function.
Christian Kell is in charge of this project that is performed in cooperation with Marcus Czabanka, Department of Neurosurgery, Goethe University Frankfurt.
Using innovative cognitive tasks we improve the quality of cognitive testing during invasive epilepsy monitoring. We acquire and analyze high quality invasive recordings with and without cortical stimulation and analyze the impact of epilepsy and stimulation on cognitive networks.
Johannes Gehrig, Diljit Singh Kajal, Henrik Kabel, Moritz Funk, and Christian Kell are in charge of this project that is performed in collaboration with Felix Rosenow, Rhein Main Epilepsy Center Frankfurt, Marcus Czabanka, Department of Neurosurgery, Goethe University Frankfurt, Wolf Singer, Ernst Struengmann Institute, and Michael Wibral, Max Planck Institute for Dynamics and Self-Organization, Goettingen.
Using electrocorticography during the transition from coma to wakefulness in the course of awake surgery we study the dynamics of the neural signal, particularly interregional information transfer.
This study is run by Christina Weismantel and performed in collaboration with Bertram Scheller, Duesseldorf, Georgios Michalareas, Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, and Volker Seifert, Department of Neurosurgery, Goethe University Frankfurt.
Using temporal representational similarity, we try to identify the way the left perisylvian cortex codes prosodic and syntactic structure during listening, speaking and when maintaining sentences in short term memory. The direct electrocorticography data are acqiured during awake brain tumor surgery.
Johannes Gehrig is primarily responsible for this project that is run in cooperation with Antje Meyer and Andrea Martin, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen.
A prevailing view in neuroscience sees the purpose of the brain in the production of complex movements. The brain is assumed to control the body, and to use sensory feedback of the resulting movements in order to update internal representations of the physical reality. An alternative view describes control as a process that keeps certain parameters of the sensed input in proximity to internal references, by appropriately varying the output. What is controlled is essentially the input, not the output of an organism.
While it is difficult to differentiate between these two frameworks generally, we try to challenge several specific predictions derived from these frameworks in the context of manual sound control. To this end, we combine experimental manipulations of task context and sensory feedback with behavioral analyses and fMRI and MEG recordings of neural activity. One prediction concerns the reliance on concurrent sensory feedback during the execution of a short discrete movement. Motor control would predict that such feedback is used to update internal models and should manifest in a change of future behavior. Perceptual control predicts immediate effects on behavior, since, according to this view, behavior is always situated in the current sensory situation. By comparing two different manipulations of concurrent auditory feedback during an auditory reaching paradigm, we hope to shed light on the contribution of on-line and model-based adaptation processes.
This study is performed by Johannes Kasper and is funded by the Polytechnische Gesellschaft Frankfurt.
Using fMRI at rest and during different sensorimotor and cognitive tasks, we aim at identifying the mechanisms by which the circadian pacemaker in the human hypothalamus modulates system-specific brain function to elicit diurnal variations in cognition and control of behavior.
This project is run by Lorenzo Cordani in cooperation with Celine Vetter and Till Roenneberg, Institute of Medical Psychology, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, and Joerg Stehle, Department of Cellular and Molecular Anatomy, Goethe University Frankfurt.
Common sense tells us that there is a difference between reality and fiction, but what has yet to be uncovered are the factors that modulate our implicit knowledge of the distinction between what is real and unreal. This basic research of aesthetic perception and evaluation is positioned between the disciplines of psychology, neurosciences, cultural studies and philosophical aesthetics, and is methodologically implemented in an fMRI-study.
This project is performed by Marion Behrens in cooperation with Pascal Nicklas, Institute for Microscopic Anatomy and Neurobiology, Gutenberg University, Mainz.
Frank Birklein, Department of Neurology, Mainz University
Susanne Fuchs, Leibniz Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft Berlin
Anne-Lise Giraud, Institut Pasteur Paris
Suzana Gispert-Sanchez, Department of Neurogenetics, Goethe University Frankfurt
Sergiu Groppa, Mainz University
Simon Hanslmayr, University of Glasgow
Pavel Hok, Department of Neurology, Greifswald University
Andrea Martin, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen
Antje Meyer, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen
Georgios Michalareas, Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, Frankfurt
Muthuraman Muthuraman, Mainz University
Katrin Neumann, Wilhelms University Muenster
Pascal Nicklas, Department of Microscopic Anatomy and Neurobiology, Mainz University
Felix Rosenow, Epilepsy Center Rhein Main, Goethe University Frankfurt
Marcus Czabanka, Department of Neurosurgery, Goethe University Frankfurt
Wolf Singer, Ernst Struengmann Institute, Frankfurt
Joerg Stehle, Department of Neuroanatomy, Goethe University Frankfurt
Michael Wibral, Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience and Max Planck Institute for Dynamics and Self-Organization, Goettingen